Software Valuation

409A valuations, M&A software asset valuations, and financial reporting from a CPA-led team that has built, valued, and exited technology companies.

AI-native companies command 25-37x revenue multiples. Template valuations miss this entirely. Our team includes a CPA and a financial engineer — combined with firsthand experience building and exiting a technology company. We produce defensible valuations, not fill-in-the-blank templates.

Starting at $15K | 1-4 weeks

Services

409A Valuation

Fair market value for IRC Section 409A compliance. Option pricing, comparable analysis with AI-native adjustments, and DLOM analysis. Audit-ready report.

1-2 weeks

M&A Software Asset Valuation

Three-approach valuation: cost (COCOMO II), market (comparable transactions), and income (DCF). Includes AI asset valuation for companies with ML/AI components.

2-4 weeks

Financial Reporting Valuation

ASC 805 purchase price allocation, ASC 350 impairment testing, and FASB ASU 2025-06 compliance. Defensible reports for audit committees and external auditors.

2-4 weeks

Expert Witness

Testimony on software valuation, IP disputes, and damages quantification. Published research and 4,000+ academic citations backing opinions.

As needed

Why us

CPA-led, not template-driven

Our valuations are led by a CPA and supported by a financial engineer with AI auditor credentials. Every assumption is documented, every comparable is justified, and every report is built to withstand Big 4 audit scrutiny.

We understand AI multiples because we build AI

We trained the first Fairly Trained LLM and published in Science on AI capabilities. When we value an AI company, we can assess the defensibility of the moat — proprietary data, model architecture, talent — not just apply a generic multiple.

Operator experience, not just advisory

We founded, built, and exited LexPredict (acquired 2018). We've been on both sides of the valuation table. That operator perspective means we understand what drives enterprise value in a technology company — and what destroys it.

Why licens.io?

AI premium

Big 4

Template comparable sets

licens.io

Understand 25-37x AI multiples

Credentials

Big 4

Generic appraiser

licens.io

CPA, M.S.E. Financial Engineering, AI Auditor on one team

Operator view

Big 4

Advisory only

licens.io

Founded and exited LexPredict

Research

Big 4

Appraiser opinion

licens.io

4,000+ citations, published in Science

FASB readiness

Big 4

Catching up

licens.io

Advising on ASU 2025-06 now

Pricing

Big 4

$1.5K templates or $50K+ Big 4

licens.io

Fixed-fee, $15K-$60K

Who this is for

  • VC-backed startups needing 409A valuations that properly account for AI components
  • PE and corp dev teams needing M&A software asset valuations for deal pricing
  • Boards and audit committees needing financial reporting valuations (ASC 805, ASC 350)
  • AI-native companies with valuation premium complexity that template providers miss
  • Law firms needing expert valuation testimony for IP disputes or damages quantification

Frequently asked questions

How much does a 409A cost for an AI company?

Our 409A valuations for AI-native companies typically range from $15K-$30K. The premium over a template valuation reflects the work required to properly account for AI assets, training data value, and the higher multiples AI companies command. A $1,500 template will not hold up if your company has meaningful AI components.

What valuation methodologies do you use for software assets?

We use all three standard approaches: cost (COCOMO II and replacement cost), market (comparable transactions with AI-specific adjustments), and income (discounted cash flow). For M&A valuations, we triangulate across all three. For 409As, we weight based on the company stage and available data.

How do you account for the AI premium in a 409A?

AI-native companies are trading at 25-37x revenue versus 6x for traditional SaaS. We adjust comparable sets to reflect this, analyze the defensibility of AI moats (proprietary data, model architecture, talent), and document why the premium is warranted. Auditors expect this level of specificity.

What is FASB ASU 2025-06?

FASB ASU 2025-06 changes how companies account for software development costs, affecting capitalization rules and impairment testing. It applies to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025. We are advising clients on implementation now, before the standard takes effect.

What is the difference between a 409A and an M&A valuation?

A 409A determines fair market value for tax compliance — it values the entire company to set a strike price for options. An M&A valuation values specific software assets for deal pricing, purchase price allocation, or financial reporting. Different standards, different methodologies, different audiences.

Need a defensible valuation?

Whether you need a 409A for your next board meeting or an independent valuation for a deal, we'll give you a defensible report — not a template.